Authority Industries Data Accuracy and Listing Integrity Policy

The data accuracy and listing integrity policy governs how contractor information is collected, verified, maintained, and corrected within the Authority Industries directory. It applies to every active listing across all trade verticals covered under the national scope of the network. Accuracy standards at the listing level directly affect whether consumers can make informed decisions when selecting licensed trade contractors, making this policy a foundational element of directory utility.

Definition and scope

Listing integrity refers to the sustained conformance of published contractor data to verifiable, real-world facts — including license status, business name, operating geography, trade specialization, and contact information. A listing that was accurate at submission may become inaccurate due to license expiration, business closure, address change, or scope-of-work modification. The policy addresses both the initial accuracy obligation at the point of intake and the ongoing obligation to reflect material changes as they occur.

The scope covers every field within an Authority Industries contractor profile, from state-issued license numbers to trade category classifications. It extends to affiliated and partner listings that appear under the national trades network structure. Data elements governed by the policy fall into two categories:

Primary identity fields — business legal name, DBA name, primary license number, license-issuing state authority, principal trade classification, and physical business address.
Operational detail fields — service area geography, secondary trade specializations, phone number, and any certifications beyond base licensure.

Primary identity fields carry a higher verification burden than operational detail fields because errors in those fields can directly mislead consumers seeking licensed professionals in regulated trades.

How it works

Verification follows a structured intake-then-monitor model. At the point of submission, each listing is cross-referenced against the licensing database of the relevant state authority — for example, a plumbing contractor in Texas is checked against the Texas State Board of Plumbing Examiners, while an electrical contractor in California is checked against the California Contractors State License Board. No listing advances to active status without a confirmed license number match.

After activation, listings enter a periodic review cycle aligned with the Authority Industries update and revision schedule. The review cycle flags listings for re-verification under three conditions:

The license number returns an expired or inactive status in the issuing state's public lookup system.
A complaint or dispute submission triggers a data review (see the Authority Industries complaint and dispute process for procedural details).
The listing has not received any contractor-initiated update within a defined rolling window, creating a staleness flag.

Staleness flags do not automatically suppress a listing. Instead, they prompt an outreach step to the listed contractor. If no correction or confirmation is received, the listing is moved to a review-pending status visible in the directory until resolution is confirmed. This approach prevents the premature removal of valid listings while ensuring readers can identify listings that may require independent verification before reliance.

Common scenarios

Scenario A — License expiration mid-cycle. A roofing contractor holds an active license at the time of listing but does not renew at the state deadline. The state database updates the license to expired status. The next automated cross-reference pass flags the listing, triggers outreach, and moves the listing to review-pending if the contractor does not confirm renewal within the general timeframe.

Scenario B — Business relocation outside stated service area. A HVAC contractor lists a 3-county service area in Ohio. The business relocates and now services a different region. Without a contractor-initiated update, the listed geography becomes materially inaccurate. A consumer relying on the listing for local service coverage would receive incorrect information. The policy treats geographic inaccuracy in operational detail fields as a correctable deficiency rather than grounds for immediate removal, provided the contractor responds to the correction prompt.

Scenario C — Name change following business restructuring. A contractor operating as an LLC changes its legal name after a merger. The license number remains the same but is now associated with the new legal entity name in the state database. The discrepancy between the published name and the name tied to the license number in the state system constitutes a primary identity field error and is escalated above the standard review timeline.

Scenario D — User-submitted correction. A consumer or referring party submits a correction through the dispute channel noting that the phone number on a listing is disconnected. The submission is logged and routed to the outreach step. User-submitted corrections are treated as data signals, not as verified facts, and require independent confirmation before any change is published.

Decision boundaries

The policy distinguishes between three outcome states for listings under review:

Active and confirmed — All primary identity fields match state licensing records and the contractor has acknowledged operational detail fields within the review window.
Review-pending — One or more fields cannot be confirmed through automated cross-reference or have not been acknowledged by the contractor within the general timeframe. The listing remains visible but carries a status indicator.
Suppressed — The license number returns a revoked or permanently lapsed status in the issuing authority's public system, or a confirmed violation of listing eligibility standards has been established. Suppression removes the listing from active directory results.

The distinction between review-pending and suppressed status is material. Suppression is reserved for situations where the listing would affirmatively mislead consumers — specifically, an unlicensed or revoked contractor appearing as active. Review-pending status serves a holding function during the period of unconfirmed information. This two-tier approach prevents both premature suppression of legitimate contractors and continued active presentation of contractors whose credentials cannot be confirmed.

Decisions to suppress are not reversed automatically. Reinstatement requires the contractor to submit documentation of restored license status from the issuing state authority, which is then independently verified before the listing returns to active status.

References

Explore This Site

Regulations & Safety Regulatory References Tools & Calculators Contractor Bid Comparison Calculator